Skip to main content

A new typeface for Parliament

Posted by: , Posted on: - Categories: Accessibility, Design, Open,, Start with user needs

Over the past several months, colleagues from across Parliament have been working with design agency SomeOne to develop a new visual identity for UK Parliament to help improve the way we communicate. We wrote about this process in an earlier blog post.

One subtle but significant element to a visual identity is the typeface. If you’ve visited the UK Parliament beta website you may have noticed that we’ve been using it as an early test bed. So how did we choose a typeface and why is it important anyway?

Why typography matters

Being able to easily read and comprehend information is important. The UK Parliament website has to display a lot of text. Imagine reading the Hansard transcript for one of the longest single sittings in the House of Lords, which lasted over 32 hours on the 10 March 2005. It’s therefore crucial that we use a typeface that can provide a good reading experience.

We also know the way people interpret text is influenced not just by what they read, but also how it’s written. The shape of the letters and the way they’re displayed can affect our understanding of content, from picking a genre of film to choosing the cheapest place to eat out.

An example of this is a New York Times experiment that showed how using different typefaces affected the reader’s level of trust in the content they read. This was important for us to consider as the Parliament website is the authoritative source of information for what’s happening in the House of Commons and the House of Lords.

Choosing a typeface

Three important factors we looked at when choosing a typeface were its personality, readability, and accessibility.

In 2012, GOV.UK introduced GDS Transport as the typeface for their online services. Originally designed for Britain’s motorway signs in the 1960s (and still used on roads today), it was later modified and updated for digital use. Being primarily used by drivers travelling at high speeds, it's been thoroughly tested and optimised for legibility over the years.

Legibility test carried out by the Road Research Laboratory at Benton Airport in 1959
Legibility test carried out by the Road Research Laboratory at Benton Airport in 1959. Used with permission from A2-TYPE.

It was a great choice for GOV.UK. Not only is it designed to maximise clarity and legibility, but it also has a lovely connection with the history of public services in the UK. So why shouldn’t Parliament also use Transport?

Although we share similar design principles to the Government Digital Service (GDS), it’s vital to make Parliament distinct from government. In our research, we’ve found that there's widespread confusion around the very separate roles of government and Parliament.

This is a difficult and long standing issue. An original typeface, along with a strong and clear visual identity, can play a big part in helping make that distinction clearer.

The agency explored a number of options for typefaces. It was important that the chosen typeface could portray Parliament’s vast heritage as well help to reflect it being an inclusive and modern organisation. So we decided on two typefaces, Register and National, which work well as a combination or individually.

An example of how Parliament uses the Register typeface
An example of how Parliament uses the Register typeface

Register is a modern, serif typeface originally designed for newspapers and magazines. It has a range of typographic features making it versatile for a huge variety of material Parliament produces, from the Parliamentary Archives to the many exhibitions we hold.

An example of how Parliament uses the National typeface
An example of how Parliament uses the National typeface

National is a simple, sans serif typeface that has subtle details that give it a personality. It reads well for long form text and is distinctive when used larger for headlines. It also looks great on screen, even at small sizes, so it would be a natural choice as the primary typeface for the website. As part of the decision making process, we also wanted to make sure that it would work well for people with different access needs.

Type and accessibility

Typography and accessibility isn’t a straightforward tick box exercise but there are things we can do which help readability. We also believe that designing for good accessibility will help improve the experience for everyone.

We started by consulting the British Dyslexia Association (BDA) typography guidelines. National has several features referenced in the guidelines that improve readability for people with dyslexia.

It has distinguishable characters for the capital I, lowercase l, and the digit 1.

The i, l, and g in Helvetica and National

It also benefits from having an extensive character set. By default, National features a double-barrelled lowercase ‘a’ and ‘g’. The BDA guidelines recommend a single-barrel (or schoolbook) ‘a’ and ‘g’ which National has available as alternative characters.

Examples of the letters a and g

To get more insights, we created type specimens and sent them to the Digital Accessibility Centre for review as their analysts have a variety of impairments. The specimen text we provided was set out in Helvetica (our previous typeface for the beta website), National, with the double-barrelled lowercase ‘a’ and ‘g’ and National with the schoolbook ‘a’ and ‘g’.

We also supplied the same specimens with inverted colours for analysts with low vision impairment. The clear preference was for National and the schoolbook characters.

Based on this feedback, we’ve worked with the typeface foundry to make the appropriate character substitutions for both digital and print.

What next?

We’ve now started to introduce the typefaces alongside the new visual identity across Parliament’s different channels. We think National and Register are a good fit for Parliament however we know everyone has different needs and preferences.

We’re building our site to web standards to help make sure that users can customise the reading experience for their own requirements. We’re regularly making improvements and we’ll continue to test and get further feedback and insights from users with a range of different access needs.

The new fonts aren’t being used on this blog yet but take a look at the beta website and send us your thoughts on the give feedback link.

Read more about the work we're doing to improve

Sharing and comments

Share this page


  1. Comment by Ian posted on

    Typo/spelling: Para beginning "To get more insights" has "double-barreled". Should be "double-barrelled".

  2. Comment by David Livingston posted on

    ‘Double-barrelled’ is new terminology to me — would generally refer to these as ‘double-storey’… not sure the gist is the same!

  3. Comment by reca posted on

    hi, is your style to use a lowercase or uppercase for 'government'?

  4. Comment by Benjamin Grounds posted on

    Great article